rjohara.net

Search:  

Narrative in the Historical Sciences: A Working Bibliography

Version of June 1996

This bibliography was compiled for members of the Darwin-L discussion group by Robert J. O’Hara (rjohara@post.harvard.edu), with additions from Debra Journet (dsjourn01@ulkyvm.louisville.edu) and Linnda R. Caporael (caporl@rpi.edu), and an appended message by Greg Ransom (gransom@ucrac1.ucr.edu) on narrative in economics. This is a preliminary, working bibliography: I have not seen all of the items listed, and some of the citations may be incomplete. Additions and corrections are welcome. The master copy of this bibliography is maintained in the Files section of the Darwin-L Archives (rjohara.net/darwin). This bibliography may be freely distributed in print or electronically as long as the references and this header remain intact. Additional bibliographies on the history of systematics, on trees of history, and on the works of Stephen Toulmin are also available in the Darwin-L Archives.

----------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: GREG RANSOM <GRANSOM@ucrac1.ucr.edu>
Subject: Economics & Narrative
To: DARWIN-L@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu

This is a bit delayed, but comes in response to Bob's inquiry about the literature on the place of narrative in the science of economics. The key texts in this literature are by D. McCloskey, _The Rhetoric of Economics_, _If Your So Smart_, and _Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics_. See also the essays in D. Lavoie, ed. _Economics and Hermeneutics_, and Vivienne Brown's essay "The Economy as Text" in R. Backhouse, ed. _New Directions in Economic Methodology_. The most important paper on the relation between history and theory in the economic literature is F. Hayek, "The Facts of the Social Sciences" in F. Hayek, _Individualism and Economic Order_. See also his "The Theory of Complex Phenomena" in F. Hayek, _Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics_, which treats the common explanatory strategies of economics, biology, and neuroscience. On the overall role of narrative in argument and explanation, I couldn't recommend more highly Larry Wright's recent essay "Argument and Deliberation: A Plea for Understanding" _J. of Philosophy_, Nov. 1995, pp. 565-585. Joseph Rouse's new _Engaging Science_ is an important characterization of the way in which the intellegibility and significance of any scientific practice comes in part from the narrative understanding in which it is situated. I might also recommend F. Hayek's "The Uses of 'Gresham's Law' as an Illustration of 'Historical Theory'" and his "Degrees of Explanation" both in his _Studies_, for more on the commonalities between the explanatory strategies of economics and other complex sciences like biology, which share common problems of the relationship between theory and history.

Greg Ransom
Dept. of Philosophy
UC-Riverside
gransom@ucrac1.ucr.edu

----------------------------------------


© RJO 1995–2010