| rjohara.net |
Narrative in the Historical Sciences: A Working Bibliography
Version of June 1996
This bibliography was compiled for members of the Darwin-L discussion group by Robert J. O’Hara (rjohara@post.harvard.edu), with additions from Debra Journet (dsjourn01@ulkyvm.louisville.edu) and Linnda R. Caporael (caporl@rpi.edu), and an appended message by Greg Ransom (gransom@ucrac1.ucr.edu) on narrative in economics. This is a preliminary, working bibliography: I have not seen all of the items listed, and some of the citations may be incomplete. Additions and corrections are welcome. The master copy of this bibliography is maintained in the Files section of the Darwin-L Archives (rjohara.net/darwin). This bibliography may be freely distributed in print or electronically as long as the references and this header remain intact. Additional bibliographies on the history of systematics, on trees of history, and on the works of Stephen Toulmin are also available in the Darwin-L Archives.
- Beer, Gillian. 1983. Darwin’s Plots. London: Ark.
- Caporael, Linnda R. 1994. Of myth and science: Origin stories and evolutionary scenarios. Social Science Information, 33: 9–23.
- Dyke, Charles. 1990. Strange attraction, curious liaison: Clio meets Chaos. The Philosophical Forum, 21: 369–392.
- Hull, David L. 1975. Central subjects and historical narratives. History and Theory, 14: 253–274. [Discusses the species problem.]
- Hull, David L. 1981. Historical narratives and integrating explanations. Pp. 172–188 in: Pragmatism and Purpose: Essays Presented to Thomas A. Goudge (L.W. Sumner, J.G. Slater, & F. Wilson, eds.). Toronto: University of Toronoto Press.
- Journet, Debra. 1991. Ecological theories as cultural narratives: F.E. Clements’s & H.A. Gleason’s ‘stories’ of community succession. Written Communication, 8: 446–472.
- Journet, Debra. 1995. Synthesizing disciplinary narratives: George Gaylord Simpson’s Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Social Epistemology, 9: 113–150.
- Landau, Misia. 1991. Narratives of Human Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Latour, Bruno, & Strum, S.C. 1986. Human social origins: Oh please, tell us another story. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 9: 169–187.
- Levine, G. 1987. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- MacIntyre, Alisdair. 1977. Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science. The Monist, 60: 453–472.
- Maynard Smith, John. 1987. Science and myth. Pp. 222–229 in: The Natural History Reader in Evolution (Niles Eldredge, ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
- McCloskey, Donald N. 1995. Once upon a time there was a theory. Scientific American, February 1995, p. 25. [Note on narrative in economics.]
- Miller, Carolyn, & Scott M. Halloran. 1993. Reading Darwin, reading nature; or, on the ethos of historical science. Pp. 106–126 in: Understanding Scientific Prose (Jack Selzer, ed.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Miller, Hugh. 1939. History and Science: A Study of the Relation of Historical and Theoretical Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Mitchell, W.J.T., ed. 1981. On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Essays dealing with narrative in a number of disciplines, including psychoanalysis, history, and anthropology.]
- Myers, G. 1989. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- O’Hara, Robert J. 1988. Homage to Clio, or, toward an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology, 37: 142–155.
- O’Hara, Robert J. 1992. Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biology and Philosophy, 7: 135–160.
- Richards, Robert J. 1992. The structure of narrative explantion in history and biology. Pp. 19–53 in: History and Evolution (Matthew H. Nitecki & Doris V. Nitecki, eds.). Albany: SUNY Press.
- Rouse, Joseph. 1990. The narrative reconstruction of science. Inquiry, 33: 179–196.
- Ruse, Michael. 1971. Narrative explantion and the theory of evolution. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1: 59–74.
- White, Eric C. 1990. Contemporary cosmology and narrative theory. Pp. 91–112 in: Literature and Science: Theory and Practice (Stuart Peterfreund, ed.). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
- White, Eric C. 1990. The end of metanarratives in evolutionary biology. Modern Language Quarterly, 51: 63–81.
----------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: GREG RANSOM <GRANSOM@ucrac1.ucr.edu>
Subject: Economics & Narrative
To: DARWIN-L@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu
This is a bit delayed, but comes in response to Bob's inquiry about the literature on the place of narrative in the science of economics. The key texts in this literature are by D. McCloskey, _The Rhetoric of Economics_, _If Your So Smart_, and _Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics_. See also the essays in D. Lavoie, ed. _Economics and Hermeneutics_, and Vivienne Brown's essay "The Economy as Text" in R. Backhouse, ed. _New Directions in Economic Methodology_. The most important paper on the relation between history and theory in the economic literature is F. Hayek, "The Facts of the Social Sciences" in F. Hayek, _Individualism and Economic Order_. See also his "The Theory of Complex Phenomena" in F. Hayek, _Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics_, which treats the common explanatory strategies of economics, biology, and neuroscience. On the overall role of narrative in argument and explanation, I couldn't recommend more highly Larry Wright's recent essay "Argument and Deliberation: A Plea for Understanding" _J. of Philosophy_, Nov. 1995, pp. 565-585. Joseph Rouse's new _Engaging Science_ is an important characterization of the way in which the intellegibility and significance of any scientific practice comes in part from the narrative understanding in which it is situated. I might also recommend F. Hayek's "The Uses of 'Gresham's Law' as an Illustration of 'Historical Theory'" and his "Degrees of Explanation" both in his _Studies_, for more on the commonalities between the explanatory strategies of economics and other complex sciences like biology, which share common problems of the relationship between theory and history.
Greg Ransom
Dept. of Philosophy
UC-Riverside
gransom@ucrac1.ucr.edu
----------------------------------------