Darwin-L Message Log 2:150 (October 1993)

Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences

This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.

Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.

<2:150>From CRAVENS@macc.wisc.edu  Fri Oct 29 11:01:13 1993

Date: Fri, 29 Oct 93 10:14 CDT
From: Tom Cravens <CRAVENS@macc.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: difference between scientific and popular explanation
To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu

Rather than the difference between scientific and popular explanation,
or perhaps prior to tackling that question, I would welcome a definition/
characterization of scientific explanation. I grappled with this quite
a bit as a (linguistics) grad student, and never did get beyond what a
fellow student called--bluntly but not inaptly--"theory-specific hand-waving".
Now I don't use the terms `explain', `explanation', etc., but cowardly
hedges instead.

(Yes, I know what a can of worms this is. I'm curious to know what is
accepted as explanation in historical sciences, or more crucially perhaps,
what isn't.)

Tom Cravens

Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!

© RJO 1995–2016