Dear Readers: Your assistance in recovering from a devastating fire will be greatly appreciated.
| rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 4:10 (December 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
<4:10>From sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu Sun Dec 5 07:52:35 1993 To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Ancestral and derived character states in systematics Date: Sun, 05 Dec 93 08:56:04 -0500 From: Sally Thomason <sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu> Bob O'Hara's clear and interesting explanation of ancestral and derived character states in systematics is easier for linguists to understand than he might have expected, because the criterion matches our criterion for subgrouping in a language family tree: shared innovations provide evidence for subgrouping, shared inherited features don't. Same principle exactly. His egg examples are more fun than our stop > fricative changes (for instance), though. Sally Thomason sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu