rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 1:20 (September 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<1:20>From DARWIN@iris.uncg.edu Sun Sep 5 19:47:18 1993 Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1993 20:53:39 -0400 (EDT) From: DARWIN@iris.uncg.edu Subject: Geology and Language, and a Darwin-L Update To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Organization: University of NC at Greensboro Greetings again to all new subscribers to Darwin-L, and thanks for the many introductions. Darwin-L is now just 48 hours old, and already we have more than 130 subscribers from 13 countries; perhaps this is a listserv box-office record? Yesterday I sent out a personal greeting to everyone, and will repeat that message in a day or two when the initial burst of subscriptions begins to settle down. People who have posted general queries already should not be discouraged if they don't get immediate replies; when a new list opens many subscribers will just watch how things go for a while before jumping in. Feel free to post your queries again in a few days when things settle down. In the mean time, since I know we have both geologists and linguists among us, I thought I would mention a fascinating book that recently appeared: Naumann, Bernd, et al. (eds.). 1992. Language and Earth: Elective Affinities Between the Emerging Sciences of Linguistics and Geology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in the History of Language Sciences, vol. 66.) It is a symposium volume with papers in English and German on a variety of 19th century linguists and geologists, including Schlegel, Grimm, Lyell, Whitney, Fuchsel, Werner, Darwin, and Hutton. (And it is outrageously priced.) As a sample of the kind of comparisons these early authors made, consider John William Donaldson in 1850: "The study of language is indeed perfectly analogous to Geology; they both present us with a set of deposits in a present state of amalgamation which however may be easily discriminated, and we may by an allowable chain of reasoning in either case deduce from the _present_ the _former_ condition, and determine by what causes and in what manner the superposition or amalgamation has taken place." (The New Cratylus; or Contributions Toward a More Accurate Knowledge of the Greek Language. London. From the second edition, 1850:14.) And geologists may recognize the allusion in this linguistic title: Johnes, Arthur James. 1843. Philological Proofs of the Original Unity and Recent Origin of the Human Race, Derived from a Comparison of the Languages of Asia, Europe, Africa, and America; being an inquiry how far the differences in the languages of the globe are referrible to causes now in operation. London: John Russell Smith. (Second edition, 1846.) The allusion is to Charles Lyell, whose influential Principles of Geology (1830-33) was titled in full: Principles of Geology, being an attempt to explain the former changes of the earth's surface, by reference to causes now in operation. "Causes now in operation" is the idea behind the geological principle of "uniformitarianism" or "actualism", which was applied widely in linguistics at the time. There is even a recent historical monograph on linguistic uniformitarianism: Christy, Craig. 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, vol. 31.) If anyone comes across conscious applications of similar geological ideas in fields other than linguistics I would be interested to hear about them. Bob O'Hara, Darwin-L list owner Robert J. O'Hara (darwin@iris.uncg.edu) Center for Critical Inquiry and Department of Biology 100 Foust Building, University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro, North Carolina 27412 U.S.A.
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!