rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 1:163 (September 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<1:163>From GA3704@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU Fri Sep 17 11:02:07 1993 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 93 10:56:20 CST From: "Margaret E. Winters" <GA3704@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU> To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Progress and Taxonomies Two, partly disjoint, comments: 1. That "Old Chinese" taxonomy is somewhere in the writing of the surrealist, Borges. I wouldn't swear to it since I read the original years ago, but I have always understood it as a parody (among other things) of scientific taxonomies. 2. In the 19th century, linguistics worried about progress in language evolution, given a basic typology of languages as isolating (each form is a separate meaning like Chinese), agglutinating (forms may be strings of meanings, but each is clearly separable from the others) and inflecting (like Latin, English... where multiple meanings may be encoded in one form - Latin -o is first person, singular, present tense, active, etc.). The question of progress was argued in two directions: either movement toward isolating was progress since one form = one meaning was the preferred state, or movement toward inflecting was progress since western languages were inflected and more sophisticated things were stated in such languages. I'm not claiming that all of this, obviously, is system-internal as argumentation, but that these conflicting views of progress in evolution of languages competed. By the way, since I am new on the list, let me introduce myself. I'm a historical linguist interested in syntax and semantics, and also do some work in the history of the field of linguistics Margaret Winters <ga3704@siucvmb.siu.edu> P.S. My apologies if the linguistics point has already been made. As I said, I'm new to the list - and enjoying it|
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!