rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 1:230 (September 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<1:230>From HOLSINGE@UCONNVM.BITNET Tue Sep 28 10:24:35 1993 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 10:48:01 -0500 (EST) From: "Kent E. Holsinger" <HOLSINGE%UCONNVM.BITNET@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU> Subject: Re: Heritability and cultural evolution To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu > In short, we have a non-theory which people want to use to explain an > unspecified phenomenon. Let's try to make this discussion a bit more concrete. I'll propose an example of a specific phenomenon, then we can argue about whether there is a theory of cultural evolution available to explain it. Then phenomenon is the family resemblance among languages. I know next to nothing about linguistics, but I take it as relatively non-controversial that there is such a thing as the family of Indo-European languages that includes such branches as Balto-Slavic (Baltic-Lithuania, Latvian; Slavic-Sorbian, Serbo-Croatian, Ukranian, Russian, etc.), Germanic (Icelandic, Faroese, English, German, etc.), Italic (Portugese, Spanish, Catalan, French, etc.), and Indo-Iranian (Persian, Kurdish, Tajik, Urdu, Hindi, etc.). I suggest that knowing nothing more than that human beings tend to speak the language of their parents and their community and that (until recently in the historical past) human populations have been relatively immobile these family resemblances are explicable are a result of descent with modification, just as the family resemblances among groups of vertebrates. To predict the details of geographic distribution of these languages requires more knowledge of the history of human movements, but we don't actually need to know *how* human language ability is acquired, provided we know *that* human offspring tend to speak the language of their parents. Knowing how language ability is acquired will yield additional insight into the mechanisms of language change, but may shed little light on the pattern of linguistic relationships. -- Kent +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Kent E. Holsinger Internet: Holsinge@UConnVM.UConn.edu | | Dept. of Ecology & BITNET: Holsinge@UConnVM | | Evolutionary Biology, U-43 | | University of Connecticut | | Storrs, CT 06269-3043 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!