rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 1:249 (September 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<1:249>From lgorbet@triton.unm.edu Wed Sep 29 00:23:53 1993 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 23:27:26 -0600 To: Darwin-L@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu From: lgorbet@triton.unm.edu Subject: Re: Language, Evolution, Linguistics Seeing Dave Policar's post tonight made it dawn on me that some tendencies we linguists have might be a bit surprising and misleading to colleagues in other disciplines. Specifically, I suspect that it is easy to underestimate the responsiveness of linguistic systems to their environments in part because much of the academic linguistic world is inclined to regard any aspect of language that *is* responsive as (ipso facto) trivial and uninteresting. So, for example, changes in vocabulary, in the complex phrases that communities make conventional, in the finer points of meaning for linguistic forms are not "where it's at" in linguistics or even in historical linguistics. Rather, it's linguistic *form* which is "really linguistic". Not that form is not also responsive to various kinds and levels of selection on the basis of functioning, both individual and social, as a growing body of work attests . But the picture that tends to get painted in linguistic scholarship is one that is systematically biased against anything that responds to external forces. It's as those the rule were "if it can be changed readily, it's superficial and unimportant". In a sense, of language as a biological phenomenon, this is true. But as several posters have remarked previously, what has evolved (in a strictly biological sense) is the capacity for such a responsive system. And surely, the tendency for all those "superficial" changes in language is part of the fodder that aided its (biological) evolution to the present state. * * * Larry Gorbet University of New Mexico Anthropology Department (but I'm really in Anthro Albuquerque, NM 87131-1086 *and* Linguistics!) lgorbet@triton.unm.edu (505) 277-4524 OFFICE (505) 883-7378 HOME
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!