rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 1:271 (September 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<1:271>From sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu Thu Sep 30 13:24:34 1993 To: HOLSINGE%UCONNVM.BITNET@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Heritability and cultural evolution Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 14:27:51 -0400 From: Sally Thomason <sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu> Kent Holsinger asks if linguists regard ease-of-learning/perception as an internal constraint (or, rather, tendency, because there are always exceptions) or an externally imposed problem. Certainly linguists' terminology differs from biologists' terminology here: for a historical linguist, internally-motivated/caused change is anything that comes from within the language & its speakers, including changes that arise in the acquisition process (first-language acquisition, that is); change that has to do with contact, whether between dialects of one language or between different languages, is externally-motivated change. But I'm not sure what the implications of this terminological difference are, if any. One could certainly try to draw a distinction between "internally- motivated" changes that happen as a result of [an analogue of] natural selection for efficient solution of a similar problem; such changes could be contrasted with changes that arise through specific imbalances in a linguistic system. But I think the line would be hard to draw, because -- to paint in very broad strokes -- you wouldn't, in principle, expect *any* internally-motivated change if you didn't have imbalances in the system. But this is a far-out hypothetical case; a language is a very complex sort of thing, and there are always imbalances, as a result of history (even aside from the kinds of dialect variation that, as someone has already pointed out, result from earlier changes). But then, I guess this too resembles the situation in biological evolution? Sally Thomason sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!