rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 2:72 (October 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<2:72>From SMITGM@hawkins.clark.edu Tue Oct 12 12:02:49 1993 To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu From: "Gerard M. Smith (HUM)" <SMITGM@hawkins.clark.edu> Organization: Clark College, Vancouver WA, USA Date: 12 Oct 93 10:01:32 PST8PDT Subject: Manuscript polymorphism Concerning the polymorphism of manuscripts, a detail of the analogy would be helpful to those of us who aren't well-versed in genetics. Would the scribal/typographic error equal DNA, or would authorial intention? Authorial intention, I would think would be a closer analogy. Seems manuscript revision has more equivalence with genetic transmission etc. The scribal/typographic error would equal environmental interaction in that the copier is not a consistent/internal force, but an external variable which affects the text. Depending on the scribes workload, working conditions, amount of ale consumed at the scribe's lunch in some cases, and the scribe's eyesight, the manuscript has a greater or lesser chance of being copied accurately. Mutations and variation in the polymorphic manuscript, then are the result of random operations and not the "intention" of the organism itself, of which the author is organically connected. Returning to the case for manuscript revision as polymorph, take for example Whitman's LEAVES OF GRASS, the authorial revision process of that text more closely resembles polymorphism than the drunken scribe, because the original blueprint is in the author's imagination, and the author is more "organically" linked with the text. The Romantics defined the universe and poetry (the mimetic representation of nature) as organic, in keeping with the scientific enlightenment of the period, so it might be enlightening to consider their employment of the muse during revision as part of this comparative study.
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!