rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 4:11 (December 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<4:11>From CRAVENS@macc.wisc.edu Sun Dec 5 21:03:08 1993 Date: Sun, 05 Dec 93 21:05 CDT From: Tom Cravens <CRAVENS@macc.wisc.edu> Subject: Re: Ancestral and derived character states in systematics To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu One major problem with the tree in historical linguistics is that it can describe closer links than general principles would allow. A grossly clumsy example... Rumanian and Sardinian, both descended from (spoken) Latin, share some striking and hard-to-explain phonological developments. These are not found in other Romance speech types. In spite of the fact that out-of-the-way Rumania and Sardinia are prime suspects as relic areas, there is no reason to believe that the developments are fossilizations of a common earlier stage (other than the observation--used to feed a circular argument-- that they are peripheral areas and do share the features in question). If we were to construct a tree of descent based on these features alone, Rumanian and Sardinian would find themselves arranged in a way that would suggest far greater affinity than is the case. Now, few linguists would want to construct a tree on the basis of one feature, but it is quite possible to choose a number of features (on purpose or by accident) which would still motivate a tree diagram showing commonality of innovations, and thus suggest close relation in linear descent, when in fact the convergence of changes appears to be quite accidental, not even traceable to the momentum of drift. Curtis Blaylock once called this "the tyranny of the Stammbaum", and it's a minor plague in (some forms of) historical linguistics. My question is, how do other historical sciences which employ the tree avoid this trap? Tom Cravens cravens@macc.wisc.edu cravens@wiscmacc.bitnet
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!