rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 5:221 (January 1994)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<5:221>From delancey@darkwing.uoregon.edu Sun Jan 30 17:45:02 1994 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 1994 15:34:37 -0800 (PST) From: Scott C DeLancey <delancey@darkwing.uoregon.edu> Subject: Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132 To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu On Sun, 30 Jan 1994, Iain Davidson wrote: > Why do all questions begin with this sort of phoneme (these sorts?)? Is > there a case in historical linguistics for some single common question root > (or two)? And Sally Thomason almost immediately replied: >the main answer to Iain Davidson's question is that the single >PIE pronoun root *kwV- is a fact about PIE, not about languages >in general (though there are no doubt other families with >similar related sets of interrogative pronominals). And Iain again: >Now we are getting somewhere? Are there other families with >similar related sets of interrogative pronominals? And if there are, where >are they and what is their history? Indeed there are others--I can think of a couple of examples offhand, and I suspect it's a pretty common pattern. The history seems pretty straightforward--you have a single interrogative, meaning something like 'what' or 'which', and the others are constructed as this interrogative plus a noun establishing the appropriate domain, so you get 'which place' for 'where', 'which person' for 'who', etc. As, for example, in Thai: ?aray 'what' khray 'who' (cp. khon 'person') myaray 'when' (mya 'time, occasion') thawray 'how much/many' (thaw 'quantity') yangray 'how' (yang 'manner, way') nay 'which' thii nay 'where' (thii 'place') yangngay 'how' (yang 'manner, way') etc. Tibeto-Burman is another example; all the interrogative words that reconstruct for the proto-language began with *k-, probably related to a still-identificable interrogative particle #ka, except for 'who', which reconstructs as *su and isn't related to the rest of the set. Scott DeLancey delancey@darkwing.uoregon.edu Department of Linguistics University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!