rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 6:3 (February 1994)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<6:3>From 00HFSTAHLKE@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu Tue Feb 1 07:43:08 1994 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 1994 08:51:33 -0500 (EST) From: 00hfstahlke@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu Subject: Re: Who, what, where, when, etc. To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Hanna Tuomisto writes: >As to chimp sign boards, I think Craig McConnell may be right: if the >chimps were never given a chance to ask questions, it's difficult to tell >whether they actually would have had the capacity to do so. Correct me if It's difficult to tell much about cognitive capacities of chimps from what's available on a computer sign board, as in the Lana Project and its successors at Yerkes. Lana, in the original project, had lexigrams (the project's term for the symbols she was trained to use) for objects and persons, relational words like prepositions, and predicative concepts like verbs. There were also symbols used as utterance initiators, including a command/request marker, recorded in computer records as PLEASE, and an interrogative marker, recorded as QUESTION. In her training and usage, PLEASE was used only with sentences directing the computer to do something, like dispense food or open a window. QUESTION was used by Lana to direct humans to do something and by humans both directively and to ask Lana for information. Lana did not commonly use QUESTION in the latter way, but I would have to dig back through data tapes to check that carefully. A fairly extensive body of data from the Lana project is reported in several chapters of Rumbaugh, Duane M. 1977. Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: the Lana Project. New York: Academic Press. I strongly recommend the book for anyone interested in a detailed review of a major primate language project. >I'm mistaken, but I recall from somewhere that chimps that were taught the >sign language used by deaf people were able to understand and formulate >questions. Unfortunately I do not have any reference on this; if anyone >does, please let me know. I can't speak to this directly, but I can recommend the following additional bibliography on the topic. As is to be expected in such a controversial area, you'll find a wide variety of viewpoints expressed in these works. de Luce, Judith, and Hugh T. Wilder. 1983. Language in primates: perspectives and implications. New York: Springer-Verlag. Premack, David. 1986. Gavagai! or the Future History of the Animal Language Controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Sebeok, Thomas A. and Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds). 1980. Speaking of apes: a critical anthology of two-way communication with man. New York: Plenum Press. Terrace, Herbert S. 1979. Nim. New York: Knopf. Wallman, Joel. 1992. Aping language. New York: Cambridge University Press. I'd like to put the question about questions in a slightly different way. That is, do chimpanzees who have been trained in some form of linguistic behavior (note I am treating as moot the question of whether chimps can learn language) express in their linguistic terms their evident capacity for inquisitive behavior. The answer, as some of the conversations in the Rumbaugh book indicate, is pretty clearly yes. Does this mean that they have a syntactic form called interrogative? Only if they've been taught it. There are other ways of expressing that illocutionary force. Herb Stahlke ============================================================================ Herbert F. W. Stahlke, Ph.D., Associate Director (317) 285-1843 Consulting and Planning Services (317) 285-1797 (fax) University Computing Services 00hfstahlke@bsuvc.bsu.edu Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306 hstahlke@bsu.edu
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!