rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 6:70 (February 1994)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<6:70>From sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu Sun Feb 13 10:00:32 1994 To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Today in the Historical Sciences Date: Sun, 13 Feb 94 11:00:30 -0500 From: Sally Thomason <sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu> Our ever-informative leader Bob O'Hara asks if there's a good source of biographical information on historical linguists. Two come to mind, though I'm not sure the first one gives days of birth & death: 1. Holger Pedersen's LINGUISTIC SCIENCE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY (I forget the date of publication -- early in this century, in Danish as I recall, and then it was translated into English; much later, in the early or mid 1960s, it was reprinted under the rinky-dink and misleading title THE DISCOVERY OF LANGUAGE) ...Pedersen's book is good bedtime reading, and contains lots of information about the people who developed historical ling. in the 19th century. One of its most charming features is the set of photographs of the major players in the Junggrammatiker movement -- but unfortunately the pictures were taken long after their Sturm & Drang period, with the result that the young firebrands of the 1870s gaze out with the grave dignity of age, long gray beards and all. 2. Thomas Sebeok, indefatigable editor and compiler (and a combatant in some controversies, notably the one about whether nonhuman animals have already, or can be taught, something resembling human language...Sebeok's answer is an emphatic No), published, some years back, a collection of linguists' obituaries (I *think* they were all obituaries); some of these, maybe most of them, are historical linguists, since before the 1950s or even 1960s most linguists were historical linguists, so of course most dead linguists were historical linguists well into the 1960s and beyond. 3. A third source, but not a very handy one, is the Linguistic Society of America's journal LANGUAGE, which publishes obituaries of past LSA presidents (and in the past, I believe, published some obituaries of non-past-presidents too, back when there were a lot fewer linguists than there are nowadays). The journal was founded in 1924, with the Society, I think -- someone can correct me if the journal didn't get going until 1925....but I don't know if they started publishing obituaries that early. Sally Thomason sally@pogo.isp.pitt.edu
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!