rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 6:83 (February 1994)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<6:83>From DARWIN@iris.uncg.edu Tue Feb 15 15:15:24 1994 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 16:17:17 -0400 (EDT) From: DARWIN@iris.uncg.edu Subject: Language and geology To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Organization: University of NC at Greensboro I am pleased that several people with geological backgrounds have introduced themselves to the group in the last few weeks, because although we have not yet had much discussion of it on Darwin-L, geology is of course one of the premier historical sciences, and was Whewell's main exemplar of "palaetiology." Some of our geologists and linguists might be interested in a fascinating book that recently appeared that examines the many parallels that were drawn in the 19th century between these two fields: Naumann, Bernd, et al. (eds.). 1992. _Language and Earth: Elective Affinities Between the Emerging Sciences of Linguistics and Geology_. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in the History of Language Sciences, vol. 66.) It is a symposium volume with papers in English and German on a variety of 19th-century linguists and geologists, including Schlegel, Grimm, Lyell, Whitney, Fuchsel, Werner, Darwin, and Hutton. (And it is outrageously priced.) As a sample of the kind of comparisons these early authors made, consider John William Donaldson in 1850: "The study of language is indeed perfectly analogous to Geology; they both present us with a set of deposits in a present state of amalgamation which however may be easily discriminated, and we may by an allowable chain of reasoning in either case deduce from the _present_ the _former_ condition, and determine by what causes and in what manner the superposition or amalgamation has taken place." (_The New Cratylus; or Contributions Toward a More Accurate Knowledge of the Greek Language_. London. From the second edition, 1850:14.) And geologists will recognize the allusion in this linguistic title: Johnes, Arthur James. 1843. _Philological Proofs of the Original Unity and Recent Origin of the Human Race, Derived from a Comparison of the Languages of Asia, Europe, Africa, and America; being an inquiry how far the differences in the languages of the globe are referrible to causes now in operation_. London: John Russell Smith. (Second edition, 1846.) The allusion is to Charles Lyell, whose influential _Principles of Geology_ (1830-33) was titled in full: _Principles of Geology, being an attempt to explain the former changes of the earth's surface, by reference to causes now in operation_. "Causes now in operation" is the idea behind the geological principle of "uniformitarianism" or "actualism", which was applied widely in linguistics at the time. There is even a recent historical monograph on uniformitarianism in linguistics: Christy, Craig. 1983. _Uniformitarianism in Linguistics_. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 31.) If anyone comes across conscious applications of similar geological ideas in fields other than linguistics I would be interested to hear about them. Bob O'Hara, Darwin-L list owner Robert J. O'Hara (darwin@iris.uncg.edu) Center for Critical Inquiry and Department of Biology 100 Foust Building, University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro, North Carolina 27412 U.S.A.
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!