rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 7:26 (March 1994)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<7:26>From fwg1@cornell.edu Thu Mar 10 15:10:23 1994 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 1994 16:10:15 -0500 To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu From: fwg1@cornell.edu (Frederic W. Gleach) Subject: French structuralism in anthropology In a similar vein to Sally Thomason's and Margaret Winters's comments on synchrony and diachrony in linguistics, I think it must be noted that while Levi-Strauss's work (and perhaps even more so that of many of his followers) emphasized synchronic structures, the theory was explicitly based in an effort to understand historical processes *through* the study of structure. L-S's famous essay on "History and Anthropology," written in 1948 although often dated to the early 1960s, when it was included as the introduction to _Structural Anthropology_ (following its inclusion in the 1958 French edition), makes plain this orientation, as do some of his later pieces (cf. esp. his published interviews). It is now quite popular in anthropology to condemn L-S and structural studies, and there are certainly some valid grounds on which they can be criticized, but "post-structuralism" in today's anthropology too often means a pose of complete rejection rather than a building on those ideas. As Marshall Sahlins has suggested, there are a lot of people standing on L-S's shoulders and shitting on his head. The structuralism of L-S can be better seen as a reaction to the ahistorical (even anti-historical) functionalism of Malinowski than to evolutionary ideas. ***************************************************************************** Frederic W. Gleach (fwg1@cornell.edu) Anthropology Department, Cornell University (607) 255-6779 I long ago decided that anything that could be finished in my lifetime was necessarily too small an affair to engross my full interest. --Ernest Dewitt Burton *****************************************************************************
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!