rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 7:63 (March 1994)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<7:63>From kent@darwin.eeb.uconn.edu Fri Mar 18 08:49:30 1994 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 08:08:07 EST From: kent@darwin.eeb.uconn.edu (Kent Holsinger) To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Time article Just a minor point, but worth mentioning. Patricia Princehouse writes: > 1) one migrant per generation is enough to prevent speciation in > animals generally That's not quite right. Wright's classic result is that the exchange of one migrant per generation is sufficient to _limit_ genetic divergence between populations (not to prevent it completely) _only_ if the only process producing divergence is genetic drift. Both points are important. 1) Migration between semi-isolated populations reduces divergence through genetic drift, but cannot eliminate it unless the product of effective population size and migration rate is infinite. Since the migration rate is intrinsically between 0 and 1, that means the population size must be infinite for migration to prevent eliminate genetic differences among semi-isolated populations, i.e., there must be no genetic drift. Wright's result refers to whether the distribution of allele frequencies among semi-isolated populations is unimodal or bimodal. If there is more than one migrant per generation (and drift is the only process producing divergence), then the distribution will be unimodal. If there is fewer than one migrant per generation, then the distribution will be bimodal. 2) Wright's result also assumes that divergence among populations is occurrring only as a result of genetic drift. If populations are subject to different selection pressures, genetic divergence may occur even in the face of *much* more gene flow. To the extent that differences among species reflect adaptive differentiation, it is conceptually possible at least that divergence happened in the face of substantially more gene flow than one individual per generation. Whether that has actually occurred, of course, is another question entirely. -- Kent
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!