rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 1:234 (September 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<1:234>From SOSLEWIS@ACS.EKU.EDU Tue Sep 28 14:23:55 1993 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 15:27:00 -0400 (EDT) From: SOSLEWIS@ACS.EKU.EDU Subject: Re: Heritability and cultural evolution To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu I am in agreement with Elihi M. Gerson up to a point. he says (1) people pretty much tend to speak the language of their conquerors too, or at least their children do. (...) Historically that may not be strictly speaking true. In the Andean area such as that around the community of Vicos they peones spoke no Spanish. It was one of the triumphs of the Vicos project when these people learned enough Spanish to communicate with officials without going through the Mestizo group, which had exploited them for years through their use of Spanish. See Jorge Isazza's Huasipungo for another account of this type of thing. When the Greeks conquered Egypt, the man in the street did not speak Greek but those in the court certainly did just as education Russians used French and German and "cultured" Americans learned French even in the backwaters of Kentucky, like Cassius Clay's daughters. Perhaps the only thing we could say about the inheritability of language is that homo spaiens has the genetic potential for learning language when brain size reaches cicra 75-cc. Perhaps some are looking for isomorphis models between genes and cultural evolution and that may be difficult to prove. Ray, EKU
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!