rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Log 2:66 (October 1993)
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
This is one message from the Archives of Darwin-L (1993–1997), a professional discussion group on the history and theory of the historical sciences.
Note: Additional publications on evolution and the historical sciences by the Darwin-L list owner are available on SSRN.
<2:66>From DARWIN@iris.uncg.edu Mon Oct 11 18:05:45 1993 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1993 19:12:31 -0400 (EDT) From: DARWIN@iris.uncg.edu Subject: Survey courses on language diversity (fwd from LINGUIST) To: darwin-l@ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu Organization: University of NC at Greensboro The following summary was recently posted to the LINGUIST list in response to a request for information on survey courses in language diversity. While some of our historical linguists may already have seen it, I thought it might be of interest to others among us, particularly evolutionary biologists who teach or have considered teaching review courses on biological diversity. Bob O'Hara, darwin@iris.uncg.edu University of North Carolina at Greensboro ------------------ begin forwarded message ------------------ Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1993 17:44:11 -0500 From: The Linguist List <linguist@tamsun.tamu.edu> Subject: 4.809 Sum: Teaching survey course on the world's languages Date: Sun, 10 Oct 93 11:21:45 CST From: karchung@ccms.ntu.edu.tw (Karen S. Chung) Subject: Survey of the World's Languages Dear LINGUIST netters: The following summarizes the messages I received from the six people who responded to my inquiry regarding references and ideas for teaching a survey course on the world's languages. Some respondents said they offer an overview of all the world's language families; some, particularly if it is only a one semester course, try to cover only a few families more thoroughly, then just touch on the others. One introduces a different language every 1-2 weeks, and covers a total of about 12 in the course. In addition to introducing the linguistic structures of the various languages, some also give background information on writing systems and culture; some even teach a little of several languages in the course. Course titles range from 'Introduction to the Study of Language' to 'Immigrant Languages' (this one can fulfill a non-Indo-European language requirement for Ph.D. students, and tends to attract ESL people). One respondent is proposing a survey of East European languages. The course tends to be oriented mainly toward linguistics majors, since there is usually an Intro to Linguistics prerequisite. Some teach it every other year or so, and have an average of 8-20 students in the course. All seem to make an active effort at preventing the course from becoming too technical and dry; one mentioned that the course tends to bog down about the middle of the semester. The standard approach seems to be family-by-family, but some respondents noted that language typology has emerged as a major theme; one suggested using typology as a basis for organizing the course. I am pleased with the references suggested (there are of course many more for individual languages), but was a little disappointed at not hearing from more people regarding their feelings about the position of such a course in a university linguistics curriculum. One respondent said he felt some of his colleagues were 'suspicious' of the course, perhpas because it lacks a tradition. He also mentioned that it is a difficult course to teach. My personal feeling is that a world language survey is a solid back- ground course that should be included in any linguistics program. It can help give students an idea of both the possibilities of human language and the actual situation of language use in the world, while also offering a macro view of language to put their linguistic studies in better perspective, regardless of the students' area of specialization. I'd be interested in hearing from anybody who either agrees or disagrees, or has other feelings on this. Suggested references: (1) Comrie, Bernard. 1990. The world's major languages. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Technical; for linguists. (Miner, Pensalfini) (2) Grimes, Barbara A., ed. 1992. Ethnologue: languages of the world (12th ed.). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics. An index is published to Ethnologue as a separate companion volume. Listings and information on genetic classification, geographical distribution, number of speakers, etc. of 6,528 of the world's languages. Particularly good for identifying obscure languages. (3) Katzner, Kenneth. 1977. The languages of the world. London and New York: Routledge and Kegal Paul. Paper. Written specimens of many languages, minimal information about each, short sketch of Indo-European, country-by-country language survey. (Miner) (4) Ruhlen, Merritt. 1987; 1991. A guide to the world's languages. Volume 1: classification. London: Edward Arnold. Paper. Family-by-family account. 'Unorthodox' position on language relationships, but useful. (Miner) (5) Shopen, Timothy, ed. 1979. (a) Languages and their speakers. Offers sketches of selected languages, including Jacaltec, Maninka, Malagasy, Guugu, Yimidhirr, and Japanese. (b) Languages and their status. Includes sketches of Mohawk, Hua (Papuan), Russian, Cape York Creole, Swahili, and Chinese. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Paper. Also, the Cambridge Linguistic Surveys, Cambridge University Press (Pensalfini). Already published: (1) Dixon, R.M.W. The languages of Australia (out of print). (2) Comrie, Bernard. The languages of the Soviet Union (out of print). (3) Suarez, Jorge. The Mesoamerican Indian languages. (4) Foley, William A. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. (5) Holm, John A. Pidgins and creoles, vol. I: Theory and structure; vol. II: Reference survey. (6) Shibatani, M. The languages of Japan. (7) Norman, Jerry. Chinese. (8) Masica, C.P. The Indo-Aryan languages. The following is a Russian language reference billed as a survey of all known languages of the world: Iartseva, V.N., ed. 1982. Iazyki i dialekty mira. Moscow: Nauka. (Feldstein) References on written languages: (1) Coulmas, Florian. 1989. The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Paper. (Miner) (2) Nakanishi, Akira. 1980. Writing systems of the world: alphabets, syllabaries, pictograms. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle. Paper. (English version of: Sekai nomoji. 1975. Kyoto) (Miner) Many thanks to: Ronald F. Feldstein <FELDSTEI@ucs.indiana.edu> Jim Holbrook <jholbroo@cscns.com> Alan Huffman <AAHNY@CUNYVM.Bitnet> Ken Miner <MINER@UKANVAX.Bitnet> Zev bar-Lev <zbarlev@zeus.sdsu.edu> Rob Pensalfini <rjpensal@MIT.EDU> Karen Steffen Chung National Taiwan University karchung@ccms.ntu.edu.tw ------------------- end forwarded message -------------------
Your Amazon purchases help support this website. Thank you!