Darwin-L Message Logs, November 1993

Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences

During its several years of operation, the Darwin-L discussion group supported a consistently high level of scholarly conversation across the entire range of the palaetiological sciences, including evolutionary biology, historical linguistics, geology, systematics, paleontology, archeology, textual transmission, genealogy, cosmology, and related fields that reconstruct the past from evidence in the present. All messages posted to Darwin-L were logged automatically by the listserv software. The list owner lightly edited these logs, removing extraneous headers and deleting occasional error messages, and the resulting files are archived here.

November 1993 Darwin-L Message Logs

• Log 3:1 — List owner’s monthly greeting
• Log 3:2 — Re: Pronouncing ‘palaetiology’
• Log 3:3 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:4 — November 1 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:5 — Bergmann’s Rule
• Log 3:6 — re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:7 — sj gould’s popular work
• Log 3:8 — Re: sj gould’s popular work
• Log 3:9 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:10 — RE: sj gould’s popular work
• Log 3:11 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:12 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:13 — Re: Desmond & Moore Darwin Bio
• Log 3:14 — Re: sj gould’s popular work
• Log 3:15 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:16 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:17 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:18 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:19 — Re: Social constructivism & Desmond/Moore biography
• Log 3:20 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:21 — Re: Desmond & Moore Darwin Bio
• Log 3:22 — Re: sj gould’s popular work
• Log 3:23 — Re: scientific and popular explanations / human evolution
• Log 3:24 — Re: Desmond & Moore Darwin Bio
• Log 3:25 — J. Tuzo Wilson
• Log 3:26 — The Selfish Gene
• Log 3:27 — Re: The Selfish Gene
• Log 3:28 — Happy Meleagris gallopavo Day
• Log 3:29 — Happy Meleagris gallopavo Day
• Log 3:30 — Re: Happy Meleagris gallopavo Day
• Log 3:31 — Re: The Selfish Gene
• Log 3:32 — Re: popular works
• Log 3:33 — HELP with works of AGRICOLA in translation?
• Log 3:34 — Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:35 — Re: HELP with works of AGRICOLA in translation?
• Log 3:36 — Re: popular works
• Log 3:37 — RE: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:38 — Re: scientific and popular explanations
• Log 3:39 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:40 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:41 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:42 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:43 — November 7 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:44 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:45 — early waterbaby
• Log 3:46 — Re: Teaching/MacClade
• Log 3:47 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:48 — Re: Teaching the historical sciences
• Log 3:49 — book announcement
• Log 3:50 — Files available, and 500th subscriber
• Log 3:51 — MacClade Updater
• Log 3:52 — November 14 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:53 — Darwin and beetles
• Log 3:54 — Re: Darwin and beetles
• Log 3:55 — Re: Darwin and beetles
• Log 3:56 — Re: Darwin and beetles
• Log 3:57 — Re: Darwin and beetles
• Log 3:58 — grad school
• Log 3:59 — phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:60 — Re: Haldane and beetles
• Log 3:61 — Re: grad school
• Log 3:62 — Haldane’s cousins
• Log 3:63 — RE: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:64 — phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. ref.
• Log 3:65 — Re: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:66 — Re: grad school
• Log 3:67 — Information on George Maw
• Log 3:68 — Re: Information on George Maw
• Log 3:69 — Re: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:70 — taxidermy
• Log 3:71 — Beetled Browse
• Log 3:72 — Weights
• Log 3:73 — Re: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:74 — Momentum
• Log 3:75 — more on maw
• Log 3:76 — Darwin biographies
• Log 3:77 — Momentum and other physical metaphors in history
• Log 3:78 — Re: Momentum and other physical metaphors in history
• Log 3:79 — Momentum
• Log 3:80 — Re: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:81 — Physical metaphors in linguistics
• Log 3:82 — November 21 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:83 — Darwin’s lost Galapagos fossils
• Log 3:84 — beetles....thanks
• Log 3:85 — November 22 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:86 — History of evolutionary thought
• Log 3:87 — Re: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:88 — Re: History of evolutionary thought
• Log 3:89 — Re: Momentum and other physical metaphors in history
• Log 3:90 — Re: phenetics vs cladistics vs evol. class.
• Log 3:91 — George Maw
• Log 3:92 — Request for Borges’s ‘Chinese’ classification
• Log 3:93 — November 23 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:94 — Books about Darwin
• Log 3:95 — Computers in Historical Linguistics
• Log 3:96 — physics and history
• Log 3:97 — Re: Austronesian affinities
• Log 3:98 — hist. of archaeology
• Log 3:99 — November 28 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:100 — Re: Austronesian affinities
• Log 3:101 — Re: hist. of archaeology
• Log 3:102 — Language history and biogeography
• Log 3:103 — November 29 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 3:104 — linguistic metaphors
• Log 3:105 — Re: Language history and biogeography
• Log 3:106 — Re: cladistics et al.
• Log 3:107 — Re: hist. of archaeology