Darwin-L Message Logs, April 1994

Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences

During its several years of operation, the Darwin-L discussion group supported a consistently high level of scholarly conversation across the entire range of the palaetiological sciences, including evolutionary biology, historical linguistics, geology, systematics, paleontology, archeology, textual transmission, genealogy, cosmology, and related fields that reconstruct the past from evidence in the present. All messages posted to Darwin-L were logged automatically by the listserv software. The list owner lightly edited these logs, removing extraneous headers and deleting occasional error messages, and the resulting files are archived here.

April 1994 Darwin-L Message Logs

• Log 8:1 — List owner’s monthly greeting
• Log 8:2 — Re: cladistics & distance data
• Log 8:3 — April 2 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:4 — Re: cladistics & distance data
• Log 8:5 — April 3 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:6 — Re: cladistics & distance data
• Log 8:7 — re: gopher
• Log 8:8 — ‘Cladistics’ and ‘typology’
• Log 8:9 — ‘Cladistics’ and ‘typology’
• Log 8:10 — April 6 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:11 — Re: Cladistic taxonomies
• Log 8:12 — Re: ‘Cladistics’ and ‘typology’
• Log 8:13 — Re: ‘Cladistics’ and ‘typology’
• Log 8:14 — Re: ‘Cladistics’ and ‘typology’
• Log 8:15 — Distance method for linguistics
• Log 8:16 — Re: Distance method for linguistics
• Log 8:17 — Re: Distance method for linguistics
• Log 8:18 — Re: ‘Cladistics’ and ‘typology’
• Log 8:19 — April 7 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:20 — March log file available on Darwin-L gopher
• Log 8:21 — History of systematics
• Log 8:22 — April 9 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:23 — species definitions
• Log 8:24 — ‘Natural history’ vs. ‘botany’: a follow-up
• Log 8:25 — Darwin and Freud
• Log 8:26 — Re: ‘Natural history’ vs. ‘botany’: a follow-up
• Log 8:27 — Re: Darwin and Freud
• Log 8:28 — Re: species definitions
• Log 8:29 — refs on ‘the species problem’
• Log 8:30 — Re: ‘Natural history’ vs. ‘botany’: a follow-up
• Log 8:31 — Re: Darwin and Freud
• Log 8:32 — Hist/Philos of Sci mtgs?
• Log 8:33 — sexual selection
• Log 8:34 — Hard rock and soft rock
• Log 8:35 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:36 — Utter Antiquity (new book)
• Log 8:37 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:38 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:39 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:40 — Who was Schlegel?
• Log 8:41 — Re: Who was Schlegel?
• Log 8:42 — Re: Who was Schlegel?
• Log 8:43 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:44 — Re: Who was Schlegel?
• Log 8:45 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:46 — Re: sexual selection
• Log 8:47 — Re: Hist/Philos of Sci mtgs?
• Log 8:48 — mating
• Log 8:49 — April 15 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:50 — Re: mating
• Log 8:51 — Science Studies archive address
• Log 8:52 — re: mating
• Log 8:53 — Re: re: mating
• Log 8:54 — HSS/PSA/4S meeting in October
• Log 8:55 — Re: mating
• Log 8:56 — Re: Schlegel
• Log 8:57 — mating
• Log 8:58 — Re: mating
• Log 8:59 — The Doctrine of Survivals
• Log 8:60 — mate choice
• Log 8:61 — re: mating
• Log 8:62 — Two more Schlegels
• Log 8:63 — Re: mating
• Log 8:64 — Re: Schlegel
• Log 8:65 — Re: The Doctrine of Survivals
• Log 8:66 — Re: mating
• Log 8:67 — Re: mating
• Log 8:68 — Botanical systematics in Australia
• Log 8:69 — April 19 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:70 — New list on historical archaeology
• Log 8:71 — Re: April 19 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:72 — Re: chimps & sex
• Log 8:73 — Re: chimps & sex
• Log 8:74 — Re: chimps & sex
• Log 8:75 — Re: chimps & sex
• Log 8:76 — April 22 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:77 — Dictionary of Concepts in History
• Log 8:78 — Re: mating
• Log 8:79 — Concept dictionaries (what good company we are in)
• Log 8:80 — Vitamin C
• Log 8:81 — Vitamin C
• Log 8:82 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:83 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:84 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:85 — new quaternary science list server
• Log 8:86 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:87 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:88 — Online access to Bishop Museum data
• Log 8:89 — Vitamin C and ‘need’
• Log 8:90 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:91 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:92 — Publishing quinarianism
• Log 8:93 — vitamin C
• Log 8:94 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:95 — Re: vitamin C
• Log 8:96 — RE: Vitamin C and ‘need’
• Log 8:97 — Re: vitamin C
• Log 8:98 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:99 — Re: vitamin C
• Log 8:100 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:101 — Vitamin C
• Log 8:102 — April 27 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:103 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:104 — Classical tradition conference (fwd from HUMANIST)
• Log 8:105 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:106 — Extinction (biological and linguistic) in the Chronicle
• Log 8:107 — Winning on comparative philology and palaetiology
• Log 8:108 — Names and essences
• Log 8:109 — Re: Extinction (biological and linguistic) in the Chronicle
• Log 8:110 — April 30 – Today in the Historical Sciences
• Log 8:111 — Re: Vitamin C
• Log 8:112 — Vitamin C toxicity