rjohara.net |
Darwin-L Message Logs, January 1994
Academic Discussion on the History and Theory of the Historical Sciences
During its several years of operation, the Darwin-L discussion group supported a consistently high level of scholarly conversation across the entire range of the palaetiological sciences, including evolutionary biology, historical linguistics, geology, systematics, paleontology, archeology, textual transmission, genealogy, cosmology, and related fields that reconstruct the past from evidence in the present. All messages posted to Darwin-L were logged automatically by the listserv software. The list owner lightly edited these logs, removing extraneous headers and deleting occasional error messages, and the resulting files are archived here.
January 1994 Darwin-L Message Logs
- Log 5:1 — List owner’s monthly greeting
- Log 5:2 — January 1 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:3 — Popular historical linguistics
- Log 5:4 — Major anniversaries for the historical sciences, 1994–1999
- Log 5:5 — January 3 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:6 — Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:7 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:8 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:9 — Hello all from a newcomer
- Log 5:10 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:11 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:12 — Re: Hello all from a newcomer
- Log 5:13 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:14 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:15 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:16 — Indo-European Homeland
- Log 5:17 — Help sought for the new OED
- Log 5:18 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:19 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:20 — Re: Linguistics controversy
- Log 5:21 — What a non-Renfrew account might consider
- Log 5:22 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 111
- Log 5:23 — January 6 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:24 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 111
- Log 5:25 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 111
- Log 5:26 — Malthus
- Log 5:27 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 111
- Log 5:28 — Darwin-L gopher archive now available
- Log 5:29 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 112
- Log 5:30 — Langdon vs. Tuomistu, Brown and Occam’s shaving foam
- Log 5:31 — Aquatic apes revisited
- Log 5:32 — Re: Aquatic apes revisited
- Log 5:33 — Greenberg and other controversial beliefs
- Log 5:34 — On going beyond evidence and method
- Log 5:35 — Re: On going beyond evidence and method
- Log 5:36 — Re: Greenberg and other controversial beliefs
- Log 5:37 — January 8 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:38 — Re: On going beyond evidence and method
- Log 5:39 — Re: Aquatic apes revisited
- Log 5:40 — Re: On going beyond evidence and method
- Log 5:41 — Re: Langdon vs. Tuomistu, Brown and Occam’s shaving foam
- Log 5:42 — Re: Aquatic apes revisited
- Log 5:43 — Method
- Log 5:44 — Arguments in science
- Log 5:45 — Re: Greenberg and other controversial beliefs
- Log 5:46 — A positive and workable idea for the historical linguists
- Log 5:47 — Greenberg & Renfrew (one last time)
- Log 5:48 — January 10 – Today in the Historical Sciences (Special Edition)
- Log 5:49 — Re: Greenberg and other controversial beliefs
- Log 5:50 — parsimony
- Log 5:51 — seeking examples of train of ‘thought’ metaphor
- Log 5:52 — re: DARWIN-L digest 115
- Log 5:53 — Re: seeking examples of ‘train of thought’ metaphor
- Log 5:54 — RE: seeking examples of ‘train of thought’ metaphor
- Log 5:55 — music and meaning
- Log 5:56 — Re: A positive and workable idea for the historical linguists
- Log 5:57 — Re: music and meaning
- Log 5:58 — Re: music and meaning
- Log 5:59 — Fair to Desmond & Moore?
- Log 5:60 — Re: Greenberg & Renfrew (one last time)
- Log 5:61 — Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:62 — Fantastics and parsimony
- Log 5:63 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:64 — Beethoven’s 5th and the BBC
- Log 5:65 — Status of anti-neo-Darwinism?
- Log 5:66 — January 12 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:67 — Re: Status of anti-neo-Darwinism?
- Log 5:68 — January 13 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:69 — On critiques of ‘neoDarwinism’
- Log 5:70 — RE: On critiques of ‘neoDarwinism’
- Log 5:71 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:72 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:73 — Administrative notes
- Log 5:74 — Help for the Irkutsk Botanic Garden
- Log 5:75 — On neoDarwinism 2
- Log 5:76 — Re: On neoDarwinism 2
- Log 5:77 — Origin of ‘drift’ in linguistics and genetics
- Log 5:78 — Neodarwinism, and the attribution of ‘importance’ to events
- Log 5:79 — Re: NeoDarwinism debates
- Log 5:80 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:81 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:82 — Re: Neodarwinism, and the attribution of ‘importance’ to events
- Log 5:83 — Preface to biblio on development and evolution
- Log 5:84 — Biblio on developmentalist critiques of neoDarwinism
- Log 5:85 — January 16 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:86 — Re: Developmentalism Bibliography
- Log 5:87 — Re: Biblio on developmentalist critiques of neoDarwinism
- Log 5:88 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:89 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:90 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:91 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:92 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:93 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:94 — Inheritance
- Log 5:95 — Re: Inheritance
- Log 5:96 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:97 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:98 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:99 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:100 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:101 — Re: Inheritance
- Log 5:102 — Re: Developmentalism Biblio
- Log 5:103 — %#@!@%@#! (Further administrative notes)
- Log 5:104 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:105 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:106 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:107 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:108 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:109 — Re: Systematics and Linguistics
- Log 5:110 — Memetics (was: Re: Systematics and Linguistics)
- Log 5:111 — memetic vs. mimetic
- Log 5:112 — January 19 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:113 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:114 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:115 — Re: Systematics and linguistics
- Log 5:116 — Upcoming AAAS session on historical linguistics
- Log 5:117 — Re: Inheritance
- Log 5:118 — Reticulate
- Log 5:119 — Conference on Language and Archeology
- Log 5:120 — Re: Beethoven’s 5th and the BBC
- Log 5:121 — LACM suffers some earthquake damage
- Log 5:122 — Re: Systematics and Linguistics
- Log 5:123 — Re: Inheritance
- Log 5:124 — question
- Log 5:125 — [Introduction]
- Log 5:126 — tools stopping evol’n
- Log 5:127 — Greetings
- Log 5:128 — Re: tools stopping evol’n
- Log 5:129 — Re: question
- Log 5:130 — Introductions are welcome
- Log 5:131 — Aristotle passage on cyclical history
- Log 5:132 — Re: tools stopping evol’n
- Log 5:133 — Re: tools stopping evol’n
- Log 5:134 — intro and tools
- Log 5:135 — Re: intro and tools
- Log 5:136 — Tools, historical questions, and the character of Darwin-L
- Log 5:137 — Re: intro and tools
- Log 5:138 — Re: intro and tools
- Log 5:139 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 129
- Log 5:140 — Tools and evolution
- Log 5:141 — tools
- Log 5:142 — Re: tools, ‘fitness’ and culture
- Log 5:143 — ‘fitness’
- Log 5:144 — The memetic and the mimetic
- Log 5:145 — Re: tools
- Log 5:146 — intro
- Log 5:147 — Self introduction
- Log 5:148 — memetic clarification
- Log 5:149 — understanding evolution
- Log 5:150 — Re: tools
- Log 5:151 — Re: Introductions are welcome
- Log 5:152 — Intro
- Log 5:153 — Announcement [PSYCHE Editors]
- Log 5:154 — Re: understanding evolution
- Log 5:155 — History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:156 — INTRODUCTIONS
- Log 5:157 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:158 — RE: INTRODUCTIONS
- Log 5:159 — Re: understanding evolution
- Log 5:160 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:161 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:162 — RE: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:163 — Posting re language adaptation
- Log 5:164 — Re: Posting re language adaptation
- Log 5:165 — January 27 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:166 — Re: Posting re language adaptation
- Log 5:167 — Re: tools
- Log 5:168 — Re: tools
- Log 5:169 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:170 — RE: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:171 — human fitness
- Log 5:172 — tools
- Log 5:173 — Re: tools
- Log 5:174 — re language adaptation
- Log 5:175 — RE: human fitness
- Log 5:176 — Re: tools
- Log 5:177 — Introduction
- Log 5:178 — Re: tools
- Log 5:179 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:180 — Re: Posting re language adaptation
- Log 5:181 — intro
- Log 5:182 — Aristotle on Cyclic History
- Log 5:183 — what evolution is...
- Log 5:184 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:185 — Re: History of ‘adaptation’ in historical linguistics
- Log 5:186 — re language adaptation
- Log 5:187 — re: DARWIN-L digest 130
- Log 5:188 — DEVELOPMENT
- Log 5:189 — ‘Adaptation’ before 1800, and the direction of adaptation
- Log 5:190 — Language, adaptation, and bird song
- Log 5:191 — Re: what evolution is...
- Log 5:192 — tools, evolution (my LAST posting on the topic)
- Log 5:193 — RE: ‘Adaptation’ before 1800, and the direction of adaptation
- Log 5:194 — history of adaptation
- Log 5:195 — ONE MORE INTRO
- Log 5:196 — Re: Adaptation/Buffon
- Log 5:197 — Re: what evolution is...
- Log 5:198 — RE: history of adaptation
- Log 5:199 — Re: Kemke and French snakes
- Log 5:200 — Re: question
- Log 5:201 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 131
- Log 5:202 — what evolution is
- Log 5:203 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 127
- Log 5:204 — Self Introduction
- Log 5:205 — Re: tools
- Log 5:206 — Re: tools
- Log 5:207 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 131
- Log 5:208 — Re: tools, evolution (my LAST posting on the topic)
- Log 5:209 — January 28 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:210 — Dobzhansky’s definition
- Log 5:211 — January 29 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:212 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 131
- Log 5:213 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 133
- Log 5:214 — Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:215 — questions in IE
- Log 5:216 — Culture, material and otherwise
- Log 5:217 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:218 — January 30 – Today in the Historical Sciences
- Log 5:219 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:220 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:221 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:222 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:223 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:224 — Moore’s Science as a Way of Knowing
- Log 5:225 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:226 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc, Re: DARWIN-L digest 132
- Log 5:227 — Re: DARWIN-L digest 134
- Log 5:228 — Re: Who, what, where, when, etc.
- Log 5:229 — Scientific quotations
- Log 5:230 — Re: Introduction
- Log 5:231 — Intros.
- Log 5:232 — Chimp Sign Boards
- Log 5:233 — Changing taxonomies of gems, minerals, etc.